Recommended Books: on Death and Heaven

Screen Shot 2020-11-10 at 9.50.08 AM.png

This past Sunday evening, I mentioned several resources which I’ve found helpful in thinking through death and the afterlife. Here they are.

Books on Dying Well

  • Farewell to My Friends by Adolph Monod — He was called "the Spurgeon of France" on account of his powerful gospel preaching. When death drew near, Monod gathered his closest friends to his bedside and shared a final series of lessons. These were written down and collected into Farewell to My Friends. You can read it online for free or purchase the book from Amazon.

Books on heaven

  • (My top pick) The Happiness of Heaven by Maurice Roberts is a sound, scriptural, and practical look at what heaven is like by a Reformed pastor. It skirts most of the unknowable questions and focuses on the joys we can count on.

  • We Shall See God by Charles Spurgeon (edited by Randy Alcorn). This is a 50-unit devotional based on the always-enriching writings of the aforementioned C. H. Spurgeon.

  • Heaven by Randy Alcorn. This popular book by a contemporary Evangelical author is sizable but easy to read. Its only significant fault is that sometimes Alcorn veers into speculation (he’s confident we’ll play basketball in glory). But I don’t recall anything really problematic.

Finally, the author whose son recently passed, who I said is like a mentor to me, is Tim Challies:

  • Here’s the post where he first announced Nick’s death.

  • For a solid devotional type book, Run to Win is worthwhile.

  • For a Christian perspective on productivity, see Do More Better.

  • His Visual Theology Guides are super interesting to look through, especially for ages 13-20. Both are in the church library.

  • The easiest place to go just might be his website: https://www.challies.com/. Every day, Tim posts an A La Carte with fresh links to resources he scours from around the Web, including news and Christian articles, as well as sales on books. And every day he posts one article of his own. Always edifying.

Resources for learning the Heidelberg Catechism

Learning the Heidelberg Catechism doesn’t have to be hard. In fact, young children memorize large portions of it every year. But it help to have some tools at your disposal. Here are some I’ve found helpful:

The Heidelberg Catechism

Here’s an online edition (mobile compatible) of the official version translated and approved by the United Reformed Churches in North America in 2016, which is in our hymnal. It’s the one to memorize.

HC Graduated Memory Book by Rev. John Bouwers

Speaking of memorizing, this handy tool presents each answer of the HC in four different versions, from shortest to fullest. In this way, children as young as three can begin memorizing. It is “graduated” because each next version of the answer builds on the last, incorporating the same words up to adult level:

Lord’s Day 1 — Q&A1

Q: What is your only comfort in life and in death?

Beginner’s Version

A: That I
belong
to Jesus Christ.

Intermediate Version

A: That I am not my own, but belong
to my faithful Savior Jesus Christ.
He has fully paid for all my sins.

He also watches over me in such a way
that not a hair can fall from my head
without the will of my Father in heaven.

Advanced Version

A: That I am not my own, but belong—
body and soul,
in life and in death—

to my faithful Savior Jesus Christ.
He has fully paid for all my sins.

He also watches over me in such a way
that not a hair can fall from my head
without the will of my Father in heaven.
in fact, all things must work together for my salvation.

Christ, by his Holy Spirit,
also assures me of eternal life
and makes me willing and ready
to live for him.

Complete Version

A: That I am not my own, but belong
body and soul,
in life and in death—

to my faithful Savior Jesus Christ.
He has fully paid for all my sins
with his precious blood,
and has delivered me from the tyranny of the devil.

He also watches over me in such a way
that not a hair can fall from my head
without the will of my Father in heaven.
in fact, all things must work together for my salvation.

Because I belong to him, 
Christ, by his Holy Spirit,
also assures me of eternal life
and makes me
wholeheartedly willing and ready
from now on to live for him.

Best of all, it uses our 2016 URCNA translation of the HC.

The Good News We Almost Forgot by Kevin DeYoung

A well-loved modern collection of weekly devotions, each based on a single Lord’s Day of the Heidelberg Catechism. The author focuses on how the good news of grace permeates our Reformed perspective on faith and life. While written for adults, I would say it’s good down to age 14.

The Sunday Reader: Vol. 2 | #31

Screen Shot 2017-12-16 at 11.53.39 AM.png

Addressing Questions About Infant Baptism

Here was my response to a few recent questions.

Should I Buy a House Near my Church

Something to consider if you have the opportunity.

How Is the Gospel Witness in Rome?

“The irony and tragedy of Italy is that it was regarded as a highly religious land and people, with deeply rooted religious traditions, but with no access to the Bible and therefore total ignorance of the Word of God.“ Here’s the current state of things in light of Reformation Day.

When Loneliness is Your Closest Companion

A widow writes on her experience of bereavement in light of her faith.

ABOUT — The Sunday Reader shares articles we've found particularly insightful, thought-provoking, or edifying this week. While not always representing the views of our Pastors and Elders, these selections offer a mix of viewpoints to broaden and frame your understanding of God, Scripture, ourselves, and the world we serve in Christ's name.

Addressing Questions about Infant Baptism

Screen Shot 2019-11-06 at 2.36.54 PM.png

Yesterday, I received the following questions from a member:

Rev. Spotts,
Where does Paul talk about baptism replacing circumcision? What HC Q&A talks about infant baptism? Canons of Dordt? BC? I’ve got a friend who says he needs to “do more research “ on infant baptism.

Thanks!

Now that I've had my coffee, I can begin to address these questions. It makes sense to share them with the church in case others are wondering, too.

The doctrinal standards to which Reformed churches historically subscribe, called the Three Forms of Unity, deal with infant baptism in several places (see excerpts copied further below):

As for, “where does Paul talk about baptism replacing circumcision?” The passage that comes to mind is Colossians 2:11-12:

“In him also you were circumcised with a circumcision made without hands, by putting off the body of the flesh, by the circumcision of Christ, having been buried with him in baptism, in which you were also raised with him through faith in the powerful working of God, who raised him from the dead.” (ESV)

To be clear, Paul does not simply say that “baptism has replaced circumcision.” The comparison he makes, rather, is that both sacraments serve the same basic purpose on behalf of the recipients and community of faith.

First, both signs outwardly identify recipients with Christ's death and resurrection.

Consider the significance of circumcision given to Abraham and his descendants. In the act, one part of the body was violently removed and cast out from God's presence. Consequently, the rest of the person was counted ceremonially clean. Likewise, Christ was “cut off and cast away” from God's presence as though unclean in order to redeem and purify his true Body, the church. Abraham may not have fully grasped this typology; yet he received it as a “seal of the righteousness which he had by faith,” and therefore somehow connected to the promised “Seed of the woman” who would someday crush the serpent’s head, who would himself be bruised (cf. Gen 3:15). Similarly, baptism is an identification with Christ’s substitutionary death. By recalling Noah's flood and the Red Sea, the water signifies the deluge of divine wrath which fell on Christ in our place.

One might object, "since we can't know if babies believe the promises pictured in baptism, why give them the sign?"

Screen Shot 2019-11-06 at 2.33.36 PM.png

The same objection could be raised about circumcision since, as has been noted, it was “a seal of the righteousness which Abraham had through faith” (Rom 4:11). Yet there is no doubt that circumcision was given to infants despite their apparent inability to repent and believe (see Lk 1:15 and Psa 22:9 on infants who were born again). This suggests the objection actually arises from a misunderstanding of the main purpose of these signs.

The covenantal signs were not given primarily to be symbols or statements of one’s own subjective experiences, whether of repentance, faith, conversion, or devotion. Were that so, the signs would be incapable of providing much comfort in times of personal weakness and sin. Rather, these sacraments graciously point us away from ourselves to the Gospel—to Christ's life-giving death and resurrection—so that we may receive the promises by faith alone. By these tangible symbols, God's hand reaches down to physically assure his church that he is happy to forgive and cleanse all who trust Christ, having given him up to death and raised him for our justification.

The Dual dynamic inherent to covenant signs

These sacraments graciously point us away from ourselves to the Gospel—to Christ’s life-giving death and resurrection—so that we may receive the promises by faith alone.

Doubtless, many Jews were circumcised outwardly who never experienced inward transformation. By contrast, those Colossian Christians whom Paul addressed were physically uncircumcised, yet had been “circumcised with a circumcision made without hands.” That is, through the miracle of new birth the Holy Spirit had united them spiritually with Christ and his death. This same dual dynamic can be applied to baptism. One may have its outward application without having inward transformation, since only those regenerated by the Holy Spirit have been “baptized with a baptism made without hands.” But ideally, a person has both.

This dynamic also means we never content ourselves merely with external baptism, either for ourselves or our children. The ritual itself does not save our children, nor do we teach covenant children to disregard personal faith. Rather, infant baptism functions as circumcision did then, as an important, God-given tool for evangelizing and discipling them in the faith. It is a picture that compels them to receive the promises pledged to them from infancy, that God cleanses all who trust Christ alone.

Moreover, we accept that God alone can perform the inward miracle, even as it says in Titus 3:4-6,

"But when the kindness and love of God our Savior appeared, 5 he saved us, not because of righteous things we had done, but because of his mercy. He saved us through the washing of rebirth and renewal by the Holy Spirit, 6 whom he poured out on us generously through Jesus Christ our Savior, 7 so that, having been justified by his grace, we might become heirs having the hope of eternal life."

Summing up

Both in Abraham's day and ours, there has been one people of God being saved by the same faith in Christ. At all times, God places the outward sign of the covenant upon adult professing believers as well as their children. By this means, he graciously establishes the external boundary of the visible church and points us to the Gospel. Therefore, one who rejects infant baptism on the basis that "babies are too little to repent and put faith in Jesus," has fundamentally misunderstood the significance of these signs, making them about what we do rather than what God does for his church through Christ, which is received by faith alone.

Finally, for those wishing to go deeper (pun intended), here is a thorough resource by Rev. Dr. R. Scott Clark:

A Curriculum For Those Wrestling Through Covenant Theology And Infant Baptism

I am grateful to have sat under him, not only as a professor at Westminster Seminary in California, but as my pastor at Oceanside URC, during my transition from credo baptism to the position I now believe most biblical, as well as truly catholic and historically Reformed. May God bless your own study and growth in the faith.


Postscript: Excerpts on Baptism from the Three Forms of Unity


Heidelberg Catechism Q. 74

Q.Should infants also be baptized?
A.Yes.
Infants as well as adults are included in God’s covenant and people,1
and they, no less than adults, are promised deliverance from sin through Christ’s blood and the Holy Spirit who works faith.2
Therefore, by baptism, the sign of the covenant, they too should be incorporated into the Christian church and distinguished from the children of unbelievers.3
This was done in the Old Testament by circumcision,4
which was replaced in the New Testament by baptism.5

1 Gen. 17:7; Matt. 19:14
2 Isa. 44:1–3O; Acts 2:38–39; 16:31
3 Acts 10:47; 1 Cor. 7:14
4 Gen. 17:9–14
5 Col. 2:11–13

Canons of Dort, Head 1, Art 17

Article 17: The Salvation of Deceased Infants of Believers
Since we must make judgments about God’s will from his Word, which testifies that the children of believers are holy, not by nature but by virtue of the gracious covenant in which they together with their parents are included, godly parents ought not to doubt the election and salvation of their children whom God calls out of this life in infancy.

Article 34: The Sacrament of Baptism

We believe and confess that Jesus Christ, in whom the law is fulfilled, has by his shed blood put an end to every other shedding of blood, which anyone might do or wish to do in order to atone or satisfy for sins.

Having abolished circumcision, which was done with blood, he established in its place the sacrament of baptism. By it we are received into God’s church and set apart from all other people and alien religions, that we may be dedicated entirely to him, bearing his mark and sign. It also witnesses to us that he will be our God forever, since he is our gracious Father. Therefore he has commanded that all those who belong to him be baptized with pure water “in the name of the Father, and the Son, and the Holy Spirit.” 77

In this way he signifies to us that just as water washes away the dirt of the body when it is poured on us and also is seen on the body of the baptized when it is sprinkled on him, so too the blood of Christ does the same thing internally, in the soul, by the Holy Spirit. It washes and cleanses it from its sins and transforms us from being the children of wrath into the children of God.

This does not happen by the physical water but by the sprinkling of the precious blood of the Son of God, who is our Red Sea, through which we must pass to escape the tyranny of Pharaoh, who is the devil, and to enter the spiritual land of Canaan.

So ministers, as far as their work is concerned, give us the sacrament and what is visible, but our Lord gives what the sacrament signifies—namely the invisible gifts and graces; washing, purifying, and cleansing our souls of all filth and unrighteousness; renewing our hearts and filling them with all comfort; giving us true assurance of his fatherly goodness; clothing us with the “new man” and stripping off the “old,” with all its works. 78

For this reason we believe that anyone who aspires to reach eternal life ought to be baptized only once without ever repeating it— for we cannot be born twice. Yet this baptism is profitable not only when the water is on us and when we receive it but throughout our entire lives. For that reason we detest the error of the Anabaptists who are not content with a single baptism once received and also condemn the baptism of the children of believers.

We believe our children ought to be baptized and sealed with the sign of the covenant, as little children were circumcised in Israel on the basis of the same promises made to our children. And truly, Christ has shed his blood no less for washing the little children of believers than he did for adults.

Therefore they ought to receive the sign and sacrament of what Christ has done for them, just as the Lord commanded in the law that by offering a lamb for them the sacrament of the suffering and death of Christ would be granted them shortly after their birth. This was the sacrament of Jesus Christ.

Furthermore, baptism does for our children what circumcision did for the Jewish people. That is why Paul calls baptism the “circumcision of Christ.”79

77 Matt. 28:19
78 Col. 3:9–10
79 Col. 2:11

The Sunday Reader: Vol. 2 | #30

Screen Shot 2017-12-16 at 11.53.39 AM.png

Sola Scriptura and the Church Fathers

Here’s a who-is-who of notable early Christians standing on the Word as our final authority.

Luke: Evangelist to the Rich

Kevin DeYoung writes, “Luke was not a poor man writing to poor people that together they might denounce the rich. It’s much closer to the truth to say Luke was a rich man writing to another rich man (and people like him) in order to show how the rich could truly follow Jesus.”

Surprisingly Useful Advice on Friendship

“Earthly wisdom and self-help might appear easier or more practical, but the most reliable route to the deep joy of biblical friendship is through the gospel and a shared goal of glorifying God through loving each other. I’ve slowly realized how immensely practical this perspective is.“

Berkhof: “Do This And Live” Is A Covenant Of Works

Some classic covenant theology served up from a well-known and loved Reformed theologian.

ABOUT — The Sunday Reader shares articles we've found particularly insightful, thought-provoking, or edifying this week. While not always representing the views of our Pastors and Elders, these selections offer a mix of viewpoints to broaden and frame your understanding of God, Scripture, ourselves, and the world we serve in Christ's name.

The Sunday Reader: Vol. 2 | #29

Screen Shot 2017-12-16 at 11.53.39 AM.png

The Gate Liturgy of Eden

In light of the coming PM sermon, here’s a post ruminating on the “gate liturgy” found in Old Covenant worship. Fascinating.

If Christians Care About Foster Care They Should Fight for Religious Freedom

It is as the title says. Worth considering as we become more involved in SafeFamilies and similar works.

How Celibacy Developed in the Early Church

In case you have wondered.

ABOUT — The Sunday Reader shares articles we've found particularly insightful, thought-provoking, or edifying this week. While not always representing the views of our Pastors and Elders, these selections offer a mix of viewpoints to broaden and frame your understanding of God, Scripture, ourselves, and the world we serve in Christ's name.

The Sunday Reader: Vol. 2 | #28

Screen Shot 2017-12-16 at 11.53.39 AM.png

Free Ebook: Taking God At His Word

Here’s your chance to get Kevin DeYoung’s excellent book at no cost.

Origins of the Creed

In light of adult Sunday school, this article explains the background of our ecumenical creeds.

Word War, World War

This heavy-hitting piece concerns the dire consequences that follow when societies agree to deny God’s natural revelation. Here’s an excerpt, “Predictably, the court went on to order the father to submit to the new trans vocabulary, forbidding him to speak to or about his daughter using her given name, or otherwise use words that would identify her as a female or as his daughter. […] Under trans ideology, the family as natural institution is finished. Whatever remains of its traditional form (now empty of public reasons for its existence) is a wholly owned subsidiary of the state, whose chief regulatory function is to enable its constituents to escape and defy what once were the family’s protective authorities of belonging and relatedness.”

ABOUT — The Sunday Reader shares articles we've found particularly insightful, thought-provoking, or edifying this week. While not always representing the views of our Pastors and Elders, these selections offer a mix of viewpoints to broaden and frame your understanding of God, Scripture, ourselves, and the world we serve in Christ's name.

The Sunday Reader: Vol. 2 | #27

Screen Shot 2017-12-16 at 11.53.39 AM.png

Here are some worthwhile articles to check out on your day of rest.

The First Sexual Revolution: The Triumph of Christian Morality in the Roman Empire

This is a thoughtful review of ways Christianity shaped culture in the first centuries after Christ and what we can learn from it today.

What Draws Atheists, Jews and Catholics to a Presbyterian Church

This concerns a popular church in New York that has sadly “become all things to all people” the easy way, by letting go of their Christian identity. Let it be something like the ghost of PURC Future, warning us not to go down that path.

To Women We Haven’t Thanked Enough

A fine reflection on the value God sees in virtuous women whom the world overlooks.

Will Unbelievers Be Annihilated or Suffer Eternally? (Revelation 14)

Tom Shreiner gives clear biblical explanation to a difficult subject.



ABOUT — The Sunday Reader shares articles we've found particularly insightful, thought-provoking, or edifying this week. While not always representing the views of our Pastors and Elders, these selections offer a mix of viewpoints to broaden and frame your understanding of God, Scripture, ourselves, and the world we serve in Christ's name.